Atlanta Injury Lawyers Blog

An Atlanta area Plaintiff has been awarded $7.25 million for a personal injury sustained in a car accident several years ago. The motor vehicle accident occurred when the at fault Defendant left his lane and entered the path of the Plaintiff's vehicle causing a head on collision. The Plaintiff was left paralyzed from the waist down. A sobriety test performed by police at the scene of the accident revealed that the 23 year old at fault driver had a blood alcohol content of .303%.

In circumstances where an individual causes a car or truck accident while under the influence of alcohol, attorneys and lawyers in Georgia may seek an award of punitive damages. Punitive damages may be awarded where a jury finds that the conduct of the defendant was so egregious that it amounted to a reckless disregard for the safety of others. The concept behind an award of punitive damages in a motor vehicle collision is that the defendant should be punished as his or her conduct amounts to more than mere negligence. The conduct almost borders on an intentional act as the defendant entered his or her vehicle with knowledge that he or she would be unable to operate a motor vehicle in a safe manner.

In Georgia, a blood alcohol level of .08% or higher validates a criminal charge of driving while under the influence. Under Georgia law, however, there is also an inference of driving under the influence where a driver is measured with a blood alcohol content between .05 and .08. This inference creates a presumption that the driver may have been impaired by alcohol, and attorneys for the driver are forced to rebut this inference in order to prevent a conviction.

Lawyers and attorneys who represent Georgia car and truck accident victims are applauding a recent decision from the Georgia Supreme Court which holds that the 2-year statute of limitation to file a personal injury lawsuit stemming from motor vehicle collision may be extended under limited scenarios. In particular, the Supreme Court held that Section 9-3-99 of the Official Code of Georgia mandates that the statute of limitation be tolled (i.e. paused) if there is traffic citation issued in conjunction with the incident. Specifically, the Court held that the 2-year statute of limitations does not begin to run until any citation stemming from the automobile accident has become fully adjudicated. The statute cannot be tolled for more than 6 years, however.

As Atlanta car accident lawyers, we are thrilled with this ruling. The practical effect of the Court's decision is that the 2-year statute of limitation is now virtually eliminated as a traffic citation is issued in conjunction with almost every car or truck accident in Georgia. During the last several years, the legislature, operating at the request of insurance companies, has passed a number of laws which have suppressed the rights of individuals who have suffered a personal injury via a car or truck accident or medical malpractice. This ruling swings the pendulum back toward Georgia personal injury attorneys and their clients, even if it's ever so slightly.

The next big decision that is awaited by lawyers and attorneys in Atlanta and throughout the state is the Supreme Court's ruling on the constitutionality of a statute which places cap on punitive damages in medical malpractice cases. As we've discussed previsously in this blog, the statute has been challenged continuously since its passage and a ruling by the Court deeming it unconstitutional would be another big victory. Let's hope that the Court continues to reemphasize the rights of injured Georgian's by declaring this legislative measure invalid.

A 3-car motor vehicle accident occurring late Saturday night in Gwinnett County, Georgia, just outside of Atlanta, has resulted in the wrongful death of one person. The details of the car accident are still under investigation, and police are yet to determine whether drugs or alcohol may have been involved. This traffic accident is the latest in a series of motor vehicle accidents over the last several weeks that have led to fatalities.

As Atlanta car accident attorneys, we continue to see an increase in traffic related wrongful deaths in Fulton, Cobb and Gwinnett Counties. As Georgia's roadways continue to become more congested, drivers are required to exercise greater levels of care while operating their vehicles. Even with the highest level of care, however, it is sometimes impossible to escape the negligent acts of another driver upon the roadway.

Given our unique perspective as personal injury lawyers in Georgia, we have noticed that many of the more serious car accidents in the Atlanta metropolitan area are caused by young and inexperienced drivers. In many instances, these young drivers are simply not sophisticated enough to recognize the dangers of operating a motor vehicle. Many times, we see accidents caused by a teenage driver who is distracted by a radio, cell phone, or ipod.

Curbing the use of handheld devices by young drivers of a vehicle is a constant battle. While there exist civil penalties if a car accident is caused by such conduct (punitive damages), the present criminal code is not strict enough. Perhaps if the legislature developed a more effective manner in which to penalize parents for allowing their children to operate motor vehicles while using such devices, we may see some progress.

A 22-year old Atlanta woman, Aimee Michael, who caused a car accident resulting in the wrongful deaths of five people is conferring with her lawyers to determine whether she will accept a plea deal offered by the prosecuting attorneys. The motor vehicle accident occurred last Easter on Camp Creek Parkway in South Fulton County. Michael, a 22-year old at the time, was driving her mother's BMW when she caused the car crash, and she has been charged with 5 counts of vehicular homicide.

In addition to criminal charges, Michael and her mother face certain civil law suits for Michael's negligent conduct in casuing the wrongful deaths of the 5 individuals. Although Michael was at fault, her mother is potentially liable under the Georgia family purpose doctrine and a theory of negligent entrustment. In order for a claim under the family purpose doctrine to succeed, a personal injury attorney must prove that Michael's mother: (1) gave her permission to drive the car on the day of the acccident; (2) that actually relinquished the car to Michael; (3) that Michael was actually in the vehicle at the time of the accident and, (4) that Michael was using the vehcile for some family purpose. To succeed on a theory of negligent entustment, a lawyer for the victims must show that Michael's mother knew of Michael's propenstiy for careless driving and, nevertheless, allowed her to drive the vhicle on the day of the accident.

In addition to claims for special damages (medical expenses, funeral costs, etc.) and pain and suffering, lawyers for the faimilies of the victims may also attempt to seek an assessment of punitive damages. Under Georgia law, punitive damages may be assessed where the wrongdoers conduct was so egregious that it amounts to a wanton dsregard for the welfare of others. A substance believed to be marijuana was found in Michael's vehicle on the day of the accident, and this evidence could be enough to obtain a punitive damage verdict from an Atlanta jury.

Atlanta personal injury attorneys, and accident lawyers throughout Georgia, are eagerly anticipating a ruling from the Georgia Supreme Court to see if the Court's Justices will strike down as unconstitutional a major piece of the Georgia legislature's 2005 tort reform law. The statute, which places a cap on non-economic damages such as pain and suffering in medical malpractice cases, has been consistently challenged as unconstitutional by trial lawyers since it became law nearly 5 years ago. The primary argument against the law is that it is unconstitutional because it infringes upon an injured party's right to a trial by jury. Opponents argue that the Georgia Constitution prescribes that a jury is to determine the amount of damages to be awarded to an injured victim, not the legislature.

The case heard by the Supreme Court is particularly egregious. The woman who brought the case is an elderly Marietta woman who sought plastic surgery to remove loose skin from under eyes. Within weeks of the surgery, the skin on her face died as the surgeon had improperly terminated blood flow to her face during the procedure. As a consequence, she was left disfigured, with irreparable harm. A Fulton County jury found the plastic surgeon at fault, and awarded the woman pain and suffering damages in the amount of $900,000.00. Because of the non-economic damages cap, however, the award was automatically reduced.

As an Atlanta medical malpractice attorney, I am hopeful that the Supreme Court finds the tort reform law unconstitutional. I have noted before in this blog, the fear of civil jury awards for medical malpractice is one of the major mechanisms by which we can ensure that our doctors do not depart from appropriate standards of care. Without physicians fearing an assessment of damages from a jury for diversions from the standard care, physicians are more prone to commit medical malpractice.

Continue reading "Atlanta Personal Injury Attorneys and Georgia Accident Lawyers Await Supreme Court Ruling on Medical Malpractice Damages Cap" »