Atlanta Injury Lawyers Blog

Atlanta personal injury attorneys, and accident lawyers throughout Georgia, are eagerly anticipating a ruling from the Georgia Supreme Court to see if the Court's Justices will strike down as unconstitutional a major piece of the Georgia legislature's 2005 tort reform law. The statute, which places a cap on non-economic damages such as pain and suffering in medical malpractice cases, has been consistently challenged as unconstitutional by trial lawyers since it became law nearly 5 years ago. The primary argument against the law is that it is unconstitutional because it infringes upon an injured party's right to a trial by jury. Opponents argue that the Georgia Constitution prescribes that a jury is to determine the amount of damages to be awarded to an injured victim, not the legislature.

The case heard by the Supreme Court is particularly egregious. The woman who brought the case is an elderly Marietta woman who sought plastic surgery to remove loose skin from under eyes. Within weeks of the surgery, the skin on her face died as the surgeon had improperly terminated blood flow to her face during the procedure. As a consequence, she was left disfigured, with irreparable harm. A Fulton County jury found the plastic surgeon at fault, and awarded the woman pain and suffering damages in the amount of $900,000.00. Because of the non-economic damages cap, however, the award was automatically reduced.

As an Atlanta medical malpractice attorney, I am hopeful that the Supreme Court finds the tort reform law unconstitutional. I have noted before in this blog, the fear of civil jury awards for medical malpractice is one of the major mechanisms by which we can ensure that our doctors do not depart from appropriate standards of care. Without physicians fearing an assessment of damages from a jury for diversions from the standard care, physicians are more prone to commit medical malpractice.